Explain why certain designated items perform poorly.s

I‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ need to have at least 5 references including Fowler, Kvale 1996 Groves 2019 I already have the data loaded. I just need some help with writing .Use the scale you have developed in Unit 5 and give it to at least five people (more if possible). For the purpose of this assessment, you will replicate the responses so that you have a minimum of 50 responses. Say, for example, that you have collected data from five individuals and coded it in your Excel spreadsheet. Copy and paste that data (5 rows) 10 times so that you have 50 rows of data. This is what you will enter into SPSS. Note: we are doing this so that we have a minimal number of respondents to obtain a useful measure of reliability. Remember, you would never do this for any real research study. Report on the results of your reliability analysis as part of this assignment by providing your Cronbach alpha. To successfully complete this assessment, you must: Interpret the descriptive statistics for the data set of 50 rows from the field test. Paste your SPSS tables into your paper; don’t attempt to “redraw” them: Case Processing Summary Descriptive Statistics Reliability Statistics Item Statistics Inter-Item Correlation Matrix Item-Total Statistics Interpret the value of the coefficient (Cronbach) alpha generated by the field test results. Make sure you continue to improve your reliability. (It may take more than one iteration. Explain why certain designated items perform poorly. Recommend strategies for improving the internal consistency of the survey instrument, based upon the item analysis. Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the psychological professions. As you write this summary, include specific concepts and survey-related terminology presented in the course. Support your decisions with relevant references, citations, ‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌and empirical research. Prior to creating and submitting your reliability analysis, refer to the Field Testing and Conducting a Reliability Analysis Scoring Guide to ensure you meet the expectations of this assignment. Check out the Survey Construction Project Description and Scoring Guide for context. Submit your survey questions and summary in the assignment area. Submission Requirements Written communication: Writing is free of errors that detract from the overall message. APA formatting: Resources and citations are in accordance with APA (7th ed.) style and formatting. References: Provide an adequate number of references to support your ideas. Length: 3–5 double-spaced, typed pages. Font: Times New Roman, 12 point. Resources Field Testing and Conducting a Reliability Analysis Scoring Guide. Sample Survey. Sample Survey Data. Performing a Reliability Analysis. Toggle Drawer [u07d1] Unit 7 Discussion 1 Conducting Interviews or Qualitative Surveys Summarize the process involved in qualitative interview survey research. Identify an appropriate situation for conducting an interview as qualitative survey research. Identify the goals and objectives of the interview. Remember that open-ended questions are for qualitative studies. Open-ended questions may not be analyzed statistically. Drawing on the issues raised in Umbach’s 2005 article, “Getting Back to the Basics of Survey Research,” which you read for this unit, identify some ethical concerns and challenges that might be encountered when conducting the interview. Devise strategies for addressing those challenges. Response Guidelines Respond to the post of another learner. Evaluate the appropriateness of quantitative survey research for the specified situation. Comment on how effectively the learner addressed the potential ethical challenges associated with the situation. see attached ‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌document.