Pls, I urge the writer to follow the assignment guidance. SOCIAL WORK ENGLAND.TO AVOID WRITING OUTSIDE BOX PLS READ THE SERIOUS CASE REVIEW (SCR) ? Introduction- 500words ? 3 Themes- 800@ 2= 1600 +700 = 2,300 Evaluation, reflection, and analysis -1000words Conclusion- 325 Introduction-500 words THEMES 1- 800 WORDS Lack of proper information sharing AMONG THEMES 1 PROFESSIONALS local health Coordinated work, robust information sharing and effective strategic oversight will better ensure all children are safeguarded. Our local information sharing within and between agencies can be further strengthened. 800words agency- local acute hospital and children social care at country A and county B social service were sharing information properly.Pls, reference no 3. Also 3 highted that was not proper information sharing between the local authority reference 3. Reference 6 What do the Children Act 1989? About the care of a child. Paragraph 28,29,30,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41 ,47,48,49,51,55 pls the case revies to see so many opportunities that professionals miss in protecting the harm from baby D Mental Capacity Act 2005 – Provide the sections used in the assignment. Reference mother got detained under section 2, of the Mental Health Act Mental Capacity Act 2005 () reference section PRE-BIRTH ASSESSMENT Reference Munro statement child protection- pls reference year Lord Laming report THEME 2- 800 WORDS The parents argued that professionals were not sharing information with THEME 2 them Transparency is key when working with families. Confident and open practitioners work better with families if their professional views are challenged, and all practitioners at times struggle to communicate with some families. Families do well when they have a good understanding of their rights and responsibilities, and can make informed choices. 800 words Lack of working together among family and professional, professional find it challenging to work with the father properly- reference no 13 -21,27,44,45,46,52,59,71pls read parents complain because the parents said that professionals did not understand or appreciate mental health issue. 17. The parents said that after Baby D’s injury, they found that the Police had little knowledge of mental health issues. WORKING TOGETHER TO SAFEGUARD CHILDREN 2018 REFERENCE LORD LAMING FINDING Munro’s view Paragraph. 26. All midwives at the acute Hospital are trained to use the risk assessment tool and Whooley questions. The local perinatal mental health guideline 2017 is available on the Hospital’s intranet but this was not followed. Professional curiosity – Professional curiosity is the capacity and communication skill to explore and understand what is happening within a family rather than making assumptions or accepting things at face value. Mental Health Act 2005 – Provide the section Mental Capacity Act 2005 () Care Act 2014 ,9, THEME 3- 700-WORD The assessment focus more on the mother than child- The voice of the child is not heard. FINDING 3 Children are best protected when the local system of management oversight in supervision and meetings is strong. This leads to well coordinated risk assessments, interventions, and planning. RECOMMENDATION 3 The Partnerships are asked to assure themselves on the quality of individual agency supervision and management oversight. CHILDREN ACT 1989 Apply theories Relevant policies Evaluation, reflection, and analysis -1000words Try to avoid an overly critical approach to practice in the SCR (eg ‘this was shocking’, ‘it was obvious that’) but critique practice – if something went wrong consider So what, why and analyse the reasons for this. Conclusion-325words ? Evaluation, reflection, and analysis -1000words ? Conclusion-325words Total-4125 ACADEMIC WRITING WITH REFERENCES AND QUOTE PLS QUOTE THE SECTIONS OF the Legislations that you are referring too pls. for example, of children Acts 1989 stated blab la blab la !!!!!!!! CHILDREN ACT 1989 MENTAL Capacity Act 2005 code of practice (2007 final edition) WORKING TOGETHER TO SAFEGUARD CHILDREN 2018 Add Relevant Theories to the assignment PLS MUNRO Professional curiosity UK WRITER For reference purposes, you can cite Serious case review (SCR) throughout as NSPCC (2021). READ THE SERIOUS CASE REVIEW (NSPCC (2021) Safeguarding in Social Work Practice – Guidance on the Assignment PLS REFERENCES ALL THESE ? CHILDREN ACT 1989 ? MENTAL Capacity Act 2005 code of practice (2007 final edition) ? WORKING TOGETHER TO SAFEGUARD CHILDREN 2018 ? Add Relevant Theories to the assignment PLS ? MUNRO For reference purposes, you can cite Serious case review (SCR) throughout as NSPCC (2021). READ THE SERIOUS CASE REVIEW (NSPCC (2021) Safeguarding in Social Work Practice – Guidance on the Assignment PLS REFERENCES ALL THESE ? CHILDREN ACT 1989 ? MENTAL Capacity Act 2005 code of practice (2007 final edition) ? WORKING TOGETHER TO SAFEGUARD CHILDREN 2018 ? Add Relevant Theories to the assignment PLS ? MUNRO ASSIGNMENT GUIDANCE 1. Explore critically procedural frameworks and professional responsibilities in relation to safeguarding children and vulnerable adults up to the point of raising a concern. 2. Critically integrate relevant social work theories and values in the process of assessing seriousness, risk, and vulnerability in the context of safeguarding. 3. Analyse critically the skills and processes involved in working collaboratively with colleagues, service users and carers in the process of safeguarding vulnerable individuals. 4. Critically analyse and understand the emotional and ethical challenges of maintaining a child/person-centred perspective while carrying out professional duties. 5. Consider critically attitudes towards people whose self-determination may be compromised and the significance of these in relation to the rights, autonomy, capacity, risk and vulnerability of service users; Assessment task: analysis of a Serious Case Review Based on the understanding of the roles and tasks involved in safeguarding, students will be required to produce a written assessment providing critical analysis of a piece of work taken from a case review that highlights a range of issues and dilemmas in relation to the processes and principles involved in safeguarding and protection. The assignment will enable students to demonstrate their understanding of the key concepts, values and challenges involved in collaborative practice with colleagues and with children and/or vulnerable adults and their networks (4000 words equivalent). Guidance PLS FOLLOW CRITICAL In the assignment you will be expected to critically analyse a particular Serious Case Review (SCR) that involved issues relating to safeguarding children or adults. All details must be anonymised as in the chosen SCR (unless this is a high-profile case, and the actual names are already in the public domain) and any breaches of confidentiality will lead to an automatic fail. Ensure that you include the chosen SCR on your reference list and reference it throughout the assignment by author if stated ., Jay (2014) or by board . KSCB (2015). You will need to select 3 key themes to focus on: these could come from the findings or recommendations or can be chosen by you from what you have read in the SCR. Introduction: 500 WORDS Briefly explain the serious case review (SCR) and why you have chosen it, clarifying the purpose of a SCR. Provide a very brief overview, . just as much information as the marker needs, not the full case history: remember the SCR you choose is a trigger to demonstrate the relevance of your knowledge, skills and values in the selected situation. Your analysis (rough nominal guide no less than 2300 words) . Identify three key themes or findings from the SCR which are relevant to social work practice and will enable you to meet the learning outcomes of the module. You will use these as a trigger to analyse safeguarding issues, and will need to apply relevant legislation, research and practice. Areas you may consider include: • The application of relevant legislation and policy and any ethical tensions . balancing rights and risks • What were the tensions and dilemmas in the SCR, how were these managed and what should or could have happened? • What practice dilemmas were present, and what knowledge, skills and theory apply to these? • How did the practitioners deal with any ethical or value conflicts . balancing needs and resources? • Were there any contextual, organisational, economic, emotional, or other factors which may have influenced decision making? Evaluation, reflection, and analysis -1000 WORDS • Evaluate the SCR itself- was it clear, effective, useful, or not and why? What could have been done better? • Reflect on the process of analysing the SCR: how has this influenced your thinking around safeguarding practice and how will this inform your own practice in future? Throughout remember to make some reference back to practice in the chosen SCR and integrate literature, legislation, policy, and practice to analyse your chosen themes. Try to avoid an overly critical approach to practice in the SCR (eg ‘this was shocking’, ‘it was obvious that’) but critique practice – if something went wrong consider So what, why and analyse the reasons for this. Conclusion 325 words References -Havard CHILDREN ACT 1989 MENTAL Capacity Act 2005 code of practice (2007 final edition) WORKING TOGETHER TO SAFEGUARD CHILDREN 2018 Add Relevant Theories to the assignment PLS MUNRO
