First, explain in your own words what Young’s five faces of oppression are. [500 words]
Second, argue that we should combine two of Young’s faces of oppression. That is, argue that we can come up with a label that seems to name a face of oppression in Young’s sense of the term, but which ultimately seems to be composed of two or more of her faces of oppression (e.g., exploitation and violence, or cultural imperialism and powerlessness, and so on.).
If your argument is successful, you should be able to explain why these two faces always occur together and why it is a conceptual impossibility for them to fail to occur together. Consider how Young might reply to your argument – why should we really believe that these two faces are inseparable as you want to say they are? [1000 words]