arugemative esaay

Five paragraph essay each paragoeah must have 4-5 sentences each . Citations must be in mla format. For the other source please use creditable sources no Wikipedia .

The essay question is – Who is to blame for the tragedy of Katrina and is climate change an immediate problem?
•Government, local, state, federal
•Residents
•Global warming, climate change
•Mother Nature
•All of the above
Here is a link and notes to use for references
Global warming notes:
•Hurricane Katrina lasted
August 23rd, 2005, to August 31st
2) 1, 883 died
3) 70 billion lost damaged in property, etc.
•Levees were never completed but were started in 1965
•Is climate change a real problem or is it just mother nature and out of our control?
•70,000 homeless Bahamas, Temperature hit 124 degrees in Pakistan, Puerto Rico casualties in Puerto Rico 2,975
7 undeniable climate change facts
The best way to respond to misinformation about climate change is to share the best information.
Social media is flooded with misinformation. One MIT study found that false stories spread six times faster than the truth on Twitter. So the best way to stop falsehoods about climate change is to spread the facts at every opportunity.
1Climate change is real and man-made, and there is overwhelming scientific consensus that this is true
Human-produced pollution is causing climate change
(Links to an external site.)
that is dangerous now and will become much more dangerous in the future if we do not act.
NASA, the National Academy of Sciences and every major scientific organization recognizes this. Indeed, 97 percent of climate scientists
(Links to an external site.)
worldwide agree that climate change is real and driven by human activity. In the scientific world, that is consensus.
2All major climate change reports are thoroughly researched and based on the most accurate, up-to-date science
For example, the National Climate Assessment (NCA) report
(Links to an external site.)
was developed and written by NOAA, NASA, the Department of Defense and experts at 10 other agencies. It was based on the most up-to-date scientific literature and matches the conclusions of thousands of other scientists around the world.
The report includes the latest attribution studies for Hurricane Harvey, which made landfall and devastated parts of the U.S. in 2017. Studies cited in the report show how human action made the storm about three times more likely to happen and increased Harvey’s rainfall by at least 15 percent, with a best estimate of 38 percent, based on data culled since 2016.
3Climate change studies are transparent
Climate change reports from major climate science institutions around the world are entirely based on thoroughly peer-reviewed scientific research, are further reviewed by external experts at various stages of development and are often even publicly available in draft form and open to review by the general public.
For example, the NCA report’s development was open for review at every step
(Links to an external site.)
. The rough draft was open for public comment and the authors were even required to respond to every public comment. The report was also reviewed and endorsed by major scientific institutions. Every statement in the report is meticulously documented with sources and citations.
Learn more about the disastrous effects of climate change
(Links to an external site.)

4Addressing climate change will strengthen the economy
Working to stop climate change can drive economic growth, while unchecked climate change is expected to have dire economic consequences. For example, Citibank estimates the costs of unchecked climate change at more than $40 trillion by 2060
(Links to an external site.)
.
Meanwhile, more than 4 million Americans
(Links to an external site.)
now work in wind, solar, energy efficiency and other clean energy jobs — far more than the 160,000 who work in the coal industry — and experts estimate that investing in revitalizing water infrastructure in the U.S. could generate 1.3 million more jobs
(Links to an external site.)
.
5Climate scientists are underpaid — or not paid at all — for their work
Scientists often volunteer their time to write climate change reports. For example, the authors of the NCA report did not receive compensation for writing the report.
6Federal climate change reports are credible because they are written by scientists, not politicians
The NCA authors, for example, are not political appointees, but impartial, independent civil servant scientists whose work is not directed by the politicians but by the facts.
It’s worth noting that fossil fuel companies fund climate studies too. In peer-reviewed climate studies by Exxon Mobil from 1977 to 2014, 83 percent acknowledged the reality of climate change
(Links to an external site.)
, and that it is caused by humans.
7Climate change reports consider a wide range of possible future scenarios
Major climate change assessments from reputable scientific institutions — such as the U.S. government’s National Climate Assessment
(Links to an external site.)
and the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s special report on different levels of warming — consider a wide range of future conditions, from the use of advanced technologies that remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, to escalating emissions from the absence of climate action.
Here is video like for video reference

834980
16 hours ago
must have intro with thesis statement
three body paragraphs
and than conclusion
834980
16 hours ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjFCv6JvZnU&t=3890s that’s the link for the video to use for reference