** use very simple words dont write professional write EASY language dont use big words. follow the info dont skip anything use only the article that i send u** Write a critical reflection wherein you apply cultural theory to examine ’emancipatory interests’ as a source of tension between Aboriginal peoples’ interests and those of the Canadian state or Enbridge in the pipeline issue. Use John Ridsdale’s chapter in The Answer is Still No as your case study. Assignment length: no more than 500 words, double-spaced, plus References list [marks will be deducted for going over word count and/or submitting late] Grades will be based on comprehensiveness and demonstrated ability to connect concepts from all readings in the Module to the point you want to make. Your commentary will be graded on: your effort to address the topic assigned the quality and depth of your analysis demonstrated ability to incorporate relevant concepts and arguments from the readings the presence of original thought and critical reflection ability to properly cite and reference the materials you used and u should use only then PDF that i send u and when u use quote highlight them in the PDF as send me as well Required Readings Potter, G. (2017). Hermeneutics and science: ‘The linguistic turn’. In The philosophy of the social sciences: New perspectives (). New York: Routledge. Coulthard, . (2014). Seeing red: Reconciliation and resentment. In Red skin, white masks: Rejecting the colonial politics of recognition (). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Bowles, P. and Veltmeyer, H. (Eds.) (2014). John Ridsdale. In The answer is still no: Voices of pipeline resistance (47-62). Halifax and Winnipeg: Fernwood Publishing.
