To support you in demonstrating proficiency, you’ll be unable to resubmit your task until you’ve consulted with a Course Instructor. You are off to a strong start and provided some great insights into issues that may affect the team morale during implementation such as the time it will take for training and taking away from patient care. Please see the rubric for more information about aspects that require revision
A1. Areas Needing Assessment
Approaching Competence
Approaching CompetenceThe description does not identify 1 area needing assessment in the organization’s health information management (HIM) workflow or does not accurately address why the area needs assessment.
EVALUATOR COMMENTS: ATTEMPT 2
The submission describes how medical record-keeping is an area that needs to be addressed, however, it does not easily identify why this area needs to be addressed based on the scenario.
A2. Staff Concern
Competent
A3. Functional Needs of Staff Members
Approaching Competence
Approaching CompetenceThe explanation does not accurately address the functional needs of HIM staff members or does not logically justify those needs.
EVALUATOR COMMENTS: ATTEMPT 2
The submission discusses handling data requests, however, specific functions needed by HIM staff are not identified.
A4. EHR Comparison
Approaching Competence
Approaching CompetenceThe description of how the use of an electronic health record can affect privacy, security, and legal aspects in ways that differ from the use of a paper medical record is not accurate.
EVALUATOR COMMENTS: ATTEMPT 2
There is a great discussion about law requirements for the privacy and security of information stored within EHRs, however, there is a limited discussion that compares EHR to paper records in regards to privacy, security, and legal aspects.
B1. Project Plan Elements
Approaching Competence
Approaching CompetenceThe description does not include each of the elements that should be included in a project plan for adopting an EHR or does not logically address the importance of each element.
EVALUATOR COMMENTS: ATTEMPT 2
The submission discusses the components of an EMR however, elements that should be included in a project plan are not easily identified.
B2. Project Team
Approaching Competence
Approaching CompetenceThe explanation of how to form a project team is not accurate.
EVALUATOR COMMENTS: ATTEMPT 2
The submission describes who the members of the project team should be, however, there is little insight given that describes how to form the project team.
B3. Benefits of EHR Adoption
Competent
C1. Cost-Benefit Analysis
Competent
C2. Difference between RFI and RFP
Competent
C2A. Preference for RFI or RFP
Approaching Competence
Approaching CompetenceThe explanation of why one request might be preferred over the other is not logical.
EVALUATOR COMMENTS: ATTEMPT 2
The submission discusses the preferred request type as RFI, however, there is no discussion of the differences between an RFI and RFP.
C2B. Use of RFI and RFP
Competent
C3. Proposal Elements
Approaching Competence
Approaching CompetenceThe explanation does not accurately identify the elements included in writing a request for proposal or does not accurately explain the information in each element.
EVALUATOR COMMENTS: ATTEMPT 2
There is a discussion about RFP, however, there is an unrelated discussion about ALlure Group and their extensive consulting expertise and no explanation as to the elements required in this proposal.
C4. Working Relationship with Vendors
Approaching Competence
Approaching CompetenceThe discussion of how to establish a good working relationship with the vendors and company representatives involved in the selection process for new technology is not appropriate or is not supported with factors that establish good working relationships.
EVALUATOR COMMENTS: ATTEMPT 2
The submission describes how successful vendor relationships are built on mutual trust and how developing and sustaining long-term customer connections is critical to the success of any organization. However, the discussion appears to be written from a vendor’s point of view rather than an organization’s point of view. This aspect seeks a discussion of factors that establish good working relationships with vendors, along with a supporting resource.
D. APA Sources
Approaching Competence
Approaching CompetenceThe submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized but does not demonstrate a consistent application of APA style.
EVALUATOR COMMENTS: ATTEMPT 2
The submission includes one source via in-text citations and a references list. Additionally, there is mention of the Allure Group with no proper attribution. Please see the attached “APA Student Helpfulness Guide” to assist with APA formatting.
E. Professional Communication
Competent
