Complaint-Oriented Policing: Regulating Homelessness in Public Space Chris Herring

i want a rough draft in a seperate page than i want a review if the article i attached below.
• A title page that shows my name Zahraa Hatif and the teacher name (W. Norris), the name, number, and section of
the class 22/WI SOC-131-92 and the date.
• An essay (review) that is at least two full pages in length (double-spaced), but no more than
three pages using 12 fonts and normal (1 inch) margins.
• Your article review should be cited using the American Psychological Association (APA) intext citation format – see the section immediately below called “APA Citation Basics.”
• Your article review should explain the research question being addressed, the methodology
used, and the findings.
• In addition, your review should analyze and evaluate the research.
• Essentially you want to provide answers to the questions you should have been asking
yourself the second time you read the article – see the section above called “Reading the
Article.”
• At the bottom of your review or on a separate page, you should have a “work cited” list
(singular because you will probably only cite one work – the article you are reviewing) in
APA format
All written assignments must be submitted as document files – Word, RTF, PDF
Guidelines for Writing Article Review Essays :
Anything you write should have a beginning (an introduction), a middle (the body), and an end
(the conclusion).
In your introductory paragraph, tell the reader what you are doing. Your short introduction
should be engaging, it should articulate the research question, it should specify the research
article being reviewed, and it should give the reader an overview of what is to come. You might
include a sentence or two regarding why you chose the topic. Here’s an example of what a good
introductory paragraph looks like:
Does the color of your skin matter when you are trying to land an entry-level, low-wage job?
A field experiment conducted by Devah Pager and her colleagues (2009) provides
compelling evidence that it does. The research of Pager and her partners shows that it isn’t
individual “skill deficiencies” or other personal deficits that explain pay and employment
gaps: equally-matched non-white job candidates had to work harder than their white
counterparts for the same opportunities (Pager, et al, 2009: 916).
In the body of your review, you need to demonstrate that you actually read the article. Pay
particular attention to the “methods” and “findings” sections. Don’t ignore the introduction or
literature review sections but be specific as to what the author(s) research strategy was and
what is learned from it. Show that you’ve done your reading by being specific: support your
points with quotes or facts from your source.