“Market-Assisted Land Reform and its application in South Africa”
Specification: First, read and reflect on the question posed by each section heading (do not alter the headings). Second, mine all the sources uploaded to Canvas for the evidence needed to answer the question. Third, flesh out the sections, writing short sentences and short paragraphs, each paragraph starting with a topic sentence that outlines the idea you will develop in that paragraph. Cite the sources you refer to in footnotes and, in each section, summarize relevant points from the sources in your own words rather than stringing together a series of direct quotations from those sources.
SECTION 1. What are the ideal design features of market-assisted (‘negotiated’) land reform (MALR), as described by Deininger (1999)? [Refer to the general principles of MALR, rather than the specific details of the South Africa case.]
SECTION 2. According to Deininger (1999), why in principle is MALR a better approach to land redistribution than administrative land reform? [Again, refer to the general principles of MALR , rather than the specific details of the South Africa case.]
SECTION 3. In South Africa’s post-1994 land reform what are the roles played by (a) community, (b) state, and (c) market? How do these roles differ from the ideal MALR model presented by Deininger?
SECTION 4. Why has MALR failed in South Africa?
REFERENCES
(The full citation of each source should follow this model)
Deininger, Klaus. 1999. “Making Negotiated Land Reform Work: Initial Experience from Colombia, Brazil and South Africa.” World Development, 27 (4): 651-672.
Only use the sources provided, always rephraze the quote, no direct quotation in the text.
