https://ccbcmd.brightspace.com/content/enforced/45986-22064.202221/An%20Unwelcome%20Discovery%20-%20The%20New%20York%20Times.pdf?_&d2lSessionVal=whuyNb60l3HTST9vd3gYN6u0y
Students are responsible for reading and analyzing the article. The student will write a 250-300-word essay that touches on the five items below:
1) In your own words, describe the scientific study that Walter DeNino worked on with Eric Poehlman that raised Walter DeNino’s suspicions of misconduct. Make sure to clearly describe the study’s focus as well as Eric Poehlman’s hypothesis for the study.
2) What type of reasoning (inductive or deductive) is Eric Poehlman using to support the study’s conclusion? Explain your answer.
3) What type of scientific research misconduct occurred?
4) How did Eric Poehlman publish peer-reviewed articles for so long without getting caught?
5) Explain the ramifications of the misconduct described in the article.
