What are the main criticisms leveled at the method(s) of appointing judges in Australia?

C‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌hoose one (1) only of the following questions: 1. What are the main criticisms leveled at the method(s) of appointing judges in Australia? Are those criticisms valid? 2. To what extent has the Australian Parliament’s ‘committee system’ enhanced the quality of parliamentary democracy? 3. Has the establishment of anti-corruption agencies (eg, the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption) within Australia been an unqualified success story? Word limit: 1200 words (max) Essay should be typed in 12 point font using 1.5 line spacing with margins large enough to allow examiner’s comments. B‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ibliography: Please use AGLC4 reference style. The essay must be accompanied by a bibliography, listing all secondary sources referred to in the essay. This does not count towards the 1200 word limit. Cases and legislation set out in the footnotes need not be included in a bibliography. Websites House of Representatives Info sheet 7 – Making Laws. https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/House_of_Representatives/Powers_practice_and_procedure/00_-_Infosheets Acts Interpretation Act 1901 https://www.legislation.gov.au/Series/C1901A00002 AGLC4 reference guide https://guides.library.uwa.edu.au/AGLC4/referenc‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌e_formats