In this module, we have looked at several metrics of economic progress (real wages, GDP per capita, etc). From a policy maker’s point of view, which one do you think is best and why?

Focus on GDP per capita as best for policy makers.
at least TWO scholarly articles. To satisfy this requirement, two articles cited must
be published in a peer-reviewed academic journal (you can find a good list here:
https://inomics.com/advice/top-economics-journals-1306599) or be published on one
of the following reputable sites: voxeu.org or
https://www.economicsobservatory.com/. Economists also use discussion papers,
policy briefs, books, or magazine/news articles to inform their research. You can use
these sources for extra references in addition to the required two scholarly articles.
• TWO pieces of data which you will have sourced yourself from a reputable source and
used to produce a diagram/table. Acceptable sources include government and
governmental agencies, NGOs, data produced as part of academic research, and
financial statement data for publicly-listed companies. For example, you may decide to
plot “real wages” and “union strikes” using data from the US Federal Reserve.
However, a screenshot of a graph obtained from an article would not count as one of
these two pieces of data since you would not have produced it yourself.
• at least ONE model which you have studied in this module as a basis for your
discussion. Remember that models are tools used by social scientists to help them study
various phenomena (CORE 2.2). It is more than using economics language:
The word limit for the final submission is 400 words. The word count includes footnotes,
tables with paragraph-like text in them, and appendices. The word count excludes your
bibliography/references, numeric tables or charts and their titles. You must state your word
count at the top of the submission document.